Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of Controlled Release Theophylline Microspheres Prepared with Cellulose Acetate Using Solvent Evaporation Method

Sunit K Sahoo1 , Satyabrata Barik1, Gourhari Dehury1, Subhakanta Dhala1, Subhakanta Kanungo1, Bhakti B Barik2, Kishore K Puhan3

1University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utkal University, Vani-Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa. Pin- 751004; 2College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, P.O. Box 114, Jazan, 45142, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 3Glenmark Research Center, Nasik, India.

For correspondence:-  Sunit Sahoo   Email: sahoosunitkumar@rediffmail.com

Received: 8 July 2010        Accepted: 23 January 2011        Published: 20 April 2011

Citation: Sahoo SK, Barik S, Dehury G, Dhala S, Kanungo S, Barik BB, et al. Evaluation of Controlled Release Theophylline Microspheres Prepared with Cellulose Acetate Using Solvent Evaporation Method. Trop J Pharm Res 2011; 10(2):195-201 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v10i2.11

© 2011 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To formulate theophylline microspheres with cellulose acetate using solvent evaporation method and evaluate the effect of various processing factors on their characteristics.
Methods: Microspheres containing theophylline were prepared with a hydrophilic, biocompatible polymer - cellulose acetate - by an emulsion solvent evaporation technique using an acetone/liquid paraffin system containing Span 80 as a surfactant. The effect of processing factors, e.g., varying drug/polymer ratio (1:1, 1:2, 1:3) and temperature (10 and 35 °C) on microsphere characteristics and drug release were examined. Similarly, microspheres with a drug/polymer ratio of 1:3 incorporating Span 20  were also also prepared and evaluated.
Results: The microspheres were white, free-flowing and spherical. The yield varied from 73.0 to 87.5 % while entrapment efficiency was in the region of 71.8 to 92.4 %. High drug/polymer ratio, Span 80 (surfactant) and processing temperature between 10 and 30 °C produced formulations with better drug entrapment efficiency. High drug/polymer ratio, low processing temperature and low HLB value of surfactant enhanced the sustained drug release characteristics of the microspheres.
Conclusion: The combination of three suitable factors - Span mixture (with HLB value of 4.3), processing temperature of 10 °C and drug/polymer ratio of 1:3 - produced a suitable controlled release theophilline microsphere formulation which could be effective for the management of asthma.
 

Keywords: Microsphere, Emulsion solvent evaporation, Theophylline, Temperature, HLB value

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates